This is a Podcast of Patent Law Class 26 (Apr. 24, 2006) in MP3 Format. In this class, we finished discussing remedies, including attorneys' fees and punitive damages.
This is a Podcast of the Patent Law makeup class (No. 25) held on Friday (Apr. 21, 2006) in the Library Classroom. In that class, we began discussing remedies for infringement, including injunctions and interest, but spent most of our time discussing the standards for assessing "lost profits" and a "reasonable royalty."
Please take a moment to click on the link below and fill out a survey on how useful the Podcaster project has been to you. The survey is anonymous. Thank you.
http://host2.teknoids.net/teksurvey/public/survey.php?name=PodCastingFinal11This is a Podcast of Patent Law Class 23 (Apr. 17, 2006) in MP3 Format. In this class, we discussed the implied license defense to patent infringement and the repair defense. We also very briefly discussed the Kewanee Oil case regarding the compatibility of state trade secret law with federal patent law.
This is a Podcast of Patent Law class 22 (Apr. 12, 2006) in MP3 format. In that class, we discussed antitrust claims based on patent infringement litigation. We also discussed the patent exhaustion doctrine.
This is a Podcast of Patent Law Class 21 (Apr. 10, 2006) in MP3 format. In this class, we discussed the defense of patent misuse and how it relates to antitrust law. The key case discussed was Dawson Chem. v. Rohm & Haas.
This is a Podcast of Patent Law Class 20 (Apr. 5, 2006) in MP3 format. In this class, we discussed indirect infringement (active inducement and contributory infringement), and began our coverage of defenses to infringement by discussing inequitable conduct.
This is a Podcast of Patent Law Class 19 (Apr. 3, 2006) in MP3 Format. In this class, we finished discussing the Doctrine of Equivalents and its limitations, including the questions of whether a narrowing amendment to a claim precludes the Doctrine regardless of whether the reason for avoiding rejection was procedural or substantive, and whether a narrowing amendment acts as a complete bar to using the Doctrine or whether it is flexible in accordance with the reasons for the amendment.
This is a Podcast of Patent Law Class 18 (Mar. 27, 2006) in MP3 format. In this class, we discussed basic infringement and licensing issues. We also began discussing the Doctrine of Equivalents and the policy arguments for and against it.
(More)This is a Podcast of Patent Law Class 17 (Mar. 22, 2006) in MP3 format. In this class, we concluded our discussion of patentable subject matter with State Street Bank.
This is a Podcast of Patent Law Class 16 (Mar. 20, 2006) in MP3 Format. In this class, we finished discussing Diamond v. Chakrabarty and continued discussing the limitations on patentable subject matter respecting abstract concepts, mental processes, and mathematical algorithms.
This is a Podcast of Patent Law Class 15 (Mar. 8, 2006) in MP3 format. In this class, we discussed the utility requirement as originally set forth in Brenner v. Manson and modified or overturned by the Federal Circuit in In re Brana. We also discussed patentable classes and began discussing patentable subject matter (Diamond v. Chakrabarty).
This is a Podcast of Patent Law Class 14 (Mar. 6, 2006) in MP3 format. In this class, we discussed motivation to combine prior art, the factors courts use to determine the level of skill of the PHOSITA, and the structural similarity doctrine.
Please note that, due to yet another equipment malfunction, only the first half hour of the class was recorded.
This is a Podcast of Patent Law Class 13 (Mar. 1, 2006) in MP3 format. In this class, we discussed some of the cases applying (or not applying) the Graham primary and secondary considerations, as well as cases discussing how to determine which prior art references are admissible as "analogous art" for purposes of nonobviousness analysis.
Powered by pLog